Educational Articles by Reza Mehvar

  1. Mehvar R, Computer-Assisted Generation and Grading of Pharmacokinetics Assignments in a Problem-Solving Course. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 61:436-441 (1997).
  2. Mehvar R, Pharmacokinetic-Based Design and Modification of Dosage Regimens. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 62:189-195 (1998).
  3. Mehvar R, Development and Evaluation of a Quasi Problem-Based, Objective-Driven Learning Strategy in Introductory and Clinical Pharmacokinetics Courses. J. Pharm. Teaching, 7:17-29 (1999).
  4. Mehvar R, Online, Individualized, and Interactive Pharmacokinetic Scenarios with Immediate Grading and Feedback and Potential for Use by Multiple Instructors. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 63:348-353 (1999).
  5. Mehvar R, Development and Application of an Online Module for Teaching Bayesian Forecasting Principles in a Clinical Pharmacokinetics Course. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 64: 121-125 (2000).
  6. Mehvar R, Creation of a Dynamic Question Database for Pharmacokinetics. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 64:441-445 (2000).
  7. Mehvar R, Principles of Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 65: 178-184 (2001).
  8. Supernaw RB and Mehvar R, A Methodology for the Assessment of Competence and the Definition of Deficiencies of Students in All Levels of the Curriculum. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 66:1-4 (2002).
  9. Mehvar R and Supernaw RB, Outcome Assessment in a PharmD Program: The Texas Tech Experience. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 66:243-253 (2002).
  10. Mehvar R, The Relationship Among Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Effects of Altered Kinetics on the Drug Plasma Concentration-Time Profiles. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 68 (article 36):1-9 (2004).
  11. Poirier T, Crouch M, Hak E, MacKinnon G, Mehvar R, and Monk-Tutor M. Guidelines for Manuscripts Describing Instructional Design or Assessment: The IDEAS format. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 68 (article 92): 1-5 (2004).
  12. Mehvar R, Role of Protein Binding in Pharmacokinetics. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 69 (article 103): 1-8 (2005).
  13. Mehvar R, Estimation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters Based on the Patient-Adjusted Population Data. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 70 (article 96):1-8 ( 2006).
  14. Poirier T, Crouch M, MacKinnon G, Mehvar R, and Monk-Tutor M. Updated Guidelines for Manuscripts Describing Instructional Design and Assessment: The IDEAS Format. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 73 (article 55):1-7 (2009).
  15. Mehvar R, A Participation Requirement to Engage Students in a Pharmacokinetics Course Synchronously Taught at a Local and Distant Campus. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 74 (article 118):1-6 (2010).
  16. Mehvar R, Confounding Issues in Estimation of Patient-Specific Pharmacokinetic Parameters and Dosage Individualization of Aminoglycosides. Curr. Clin. Pharmacol., 7:28-35 (2012).
  17. Mehvar R, Effects of Simulations on the Learning of Pharmacokinetics Concepts. Curr. Pharm. Teach. Learn., 4:278-284 (2012).
  18. Mehvar R, The Importance of Active Learning and Practice on the Students’ Mastery of Pharmacokinetic Calculations for the Intermittent Intravenous Infusion Dosing of Antibiotics. BMC Med. Educ., 12 (1): Article 116 (2012).
  19. Mehvar R, Why Every Aspect of an Academic Pharmacy Career Should Be Viewed Through the Lens of Scholarship. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 81 (1): Article 2 (2017).
  20. Mehvar R  and Beuttler R, Effects of a Multicourse, Composite Examination Method on the Performance of PharmD Students in a Basic Pharmacokinetics Course. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 82 (5): Article 6286 (2018).
  21. Mehvar R  and Beuttler R, Effects of Transition from Closed-Book to Open-Book Assessment on Students’ Scores in a Pharmacokinetics Course. Pharmacy 11 (5): 134 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy11050134.
  22. Mehvar R, A Practical Guide to Grade Adjustment or Curving for Pharmacy and Other Professional Health Programs. Pharmacy 13 (1): 4 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13010004.